Testing Fraud in Nova Scotia - Memes

EUA with regards to COVID testing in 2020 and 2021

PCR testing has been called the gold standard by paid “experts” around the world. This type of testing is used to detect COVID cases. Other tests used are antigen, and serology.¹

In 2007, an article from the New York Times explained that PCR testing can mislead people. At Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, PCR testing was used, resulting in a whooping cough epidemic. 8 months later it was determined that all the PCR tests had been false positives. The PCR test is not perfect.²

All of the tests used in Canada in 2020, and 2021 were Emergency Use Authorized.

A 2017 FDA document on the subject of Emergency Use Authorization states the following:

b. Evidence of Effectiveness

Medical products that may be considered for an EUA are those that "may be effective"³

COVID 19 tests have detailed inserts on the proper use of the tests. By looking at many FOIPOP’s released in Nova Scotia it becomes clear that these inserts were ignored.⁴

If the insert instructions were not read, understood and followed this puts a lot of what happened regarding an alleged pandemic in Nova Scotia into question.

The following are inserts from tests and my comments on these inserts from tests used in NS. These inserts were made available through FOIPOP.

from page 109 of FOIPOP

BD Veritor™ System For Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (EUA)

Results are for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen. This antigen is generally detectable in upper respiratory samples during the acute phase of infection. Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses.

Note: the test is to be used when the person has symptoms. Even a person who has symptoms and tests positive may have other viral or bacterial infections at the same time.

page 121 of the FOIPOP

BD Veritor™ System For Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (EUA)

The PPV (percentage of positive test results that are true positives) varies with disease prevalence. As disease prevalence decreases, the percent of test result that are false positive increase.

Note: Norman Fenton explains in Where are the numbers? that “when the infection rate is very low almost all positive results will be false positives.”⁵ He was talking about the PCR tests, in this case the test insert for an antigen test has brought this to our attention.

Did Health Canada give this a moments thought?

It seems they did not.

ABBOTT brand - ID NOW™ (EUA)

Page 136 of FOIPOP

The SARS-CoV-2RNA is generally detectable in respiratory samples during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status. Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses.

Notes:

Once again the test reminds the user that the test was not designed to be used by asymptomatic subjects. The test reminds the user even with symptoms, a positive test does not rule out bacterial infections, or other viruses.

It becomes clear that testing was conducted without considering the limitations of the products provided. These tests were EUA; meaning that they were not guaranteed to work. They were also authorized due to an “emergency” because it was deemed that they “may be effective”.

Who actually died or was injured from COVID in Nova Scotia, if the tests were all EUA, and thus were never put under any scrutiny?

1. Testing for COVID-19: When to get tested and testing results

2. Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t

3. Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities

4. Nova-Scotia-FOI-Document-Dump_compressed

5. False positives: the elephant in the room