In a previous article I wrote, which I’ll link in the footnotes, I talked about "disease mongering." Basically, the hype around the spike protein is a classic example of this trick.
Yes, all the talk of spike proteins divided us even further, and was a whole other level of fear mongering. I was at peace with 'the vaccinated'. They made their choice, I made mine. Then came the whole "they are shedding spike proteins, you will get sick if you're around them", which was the equivalent of the message given to them "they are spreading the virus, you are still at risk even though you're partially vaccinated". Whoever was behind this played every angle. Even those who believed in 'Covid', but not 'the vaccines' were sold Ivermectin... God only knows what they're planning next.
I agree. People find it hard to believe that this was meticulously planned, including the strategy to involve opponents who would disappoint those who rightfully dissented. I also wonder if computers were used to devise these plans. Computers are incredibly powerful and often underestimated by many.
Yes it's very possible. And with the advent of AI, they could construct fake dissenters and pit them against each other online, in an endless stalemate. Maybe they already have. I'm constantly reconsidering things I previously took for granted.
It’s nice when once in a while there appears to be scientific evidence that would confirm the accuracy of my totally unscientific bullshit detection sensors.
Yes, all the talk of spike proteins divided us even further, and was a whole other level of fear mongering. I was at peace with 'the vaccinated'. They made their choice, I made mine. Then came the whole "they are shedding spike proteins, you will get sick if you're around them", which was the equivalent of the message given to them "they are spreading the virus, you are still at risk even though you're partially vaccinated". Whoever was behind this played every angle. Even those who believed in 'Covid', but not 'the vaccines' were sold Ivermectin... God only knows what they're planning next.
I agree. People find it hard to believe that this was meticulously planned, including the strategy to involve opponents who would disappoint those who rightfully dissented. I also wonder if computers were used to devise these plans. Computers are incredibly powerful and often underestimated by many.
Yes it's very possible. And with the advent of AI, they could construct fake dissenters and pit them against each other online, in an endless stalemate. Maybe they already have. I'm constantly reconsidering things I previously took for granted.
It’s nice when once in a while there appears to be scientific evidence that would confirm the accuracy of my totally unscientific bullshit detection sensors.
:D