Nobody Is Talking About This
How compliant will you be? Nobody is talking about this, are you going to go along with the new narrative?
It is very controversial to discuss this topic. Nobody seems to be addressing it, which contributes to its contentious nature. Additionally, correlation does not imply causation. When COVID began, I had strong reservations about many of the countermeasures implemented. Initially, I believed it would only last a few weeks before we would return to normal. At first, I complied and even purchased a fabric face mask, willing to wear it voluntarily. However, my perspective shifted drastically upon learning that wearing masks would become mandatory for me and everyone else. That was when I realized something was amiss. There were several other red flags as well.
I remember seeing death counters on social media that indicated a high number of COVID-related deaths1….
This made me hesitant to voice my thoughts, but I still didn’t believe we were being told the truth or that the situation was being handled appropriately, given the level of authoritarianism. I recognized that this mindset was unhealthy; telling people they would die if they contracted the virus was detrimental. I understood how crucial the mind is in this context—negative thoughts can lead to various health issues. For instance, if you're conditioned to fear something, it can trigger physical responses like rapid breathing, and later, when you try to sleep, your mind might be plagued with fears. This stress can weaken your immune system, possibly leading to illnesses you wouldn't have otherwise experienced.
So I knew there was something wrong. I also knew it would be years before we found our way collectively to get out of this. I came to this awareness when I saw how much money and time was being spent on investigating COVID. We were all being told to be afraid, and research was being conducted to support our fears.
I am writing this now to implore you that we now have the information we needed at the beginning to get ourselves out of it.
However, nobody is discussing it. Because of this lack of discussion, it is considered fringe and controversial. In fact, it cannot be proven since it only shows correlation, and to substantiate it, we would have needed to provide proof. There are a couple of things to consider here.
Correlation is not causation; however, the same principle should apply to COVID. Just because someone tests positive for COVID—regardless of whether they had something like orange juice2 before testing, which can potentially interfere with the test—does not automatically mean that their death was due to COVID.
Correlation does not imply causation. Yet, according to some "expert" opinions, correlation is treated as causation in this context. This perspective may not be credible; those who promote it may not possess genuine intelligence but instead exhibit a form of obedience to prevailing narratives. It would be prudent to have investigated the patients who allegedly died of COVID for viral particles and assessed for associated lung damage. However, one must acknowledge that lung damage can also occur due to treatments involving oxygen.
It’s worth noting that while ventilators are often associated with risks, oxygen itself can be hazardous and lead to lung damage as well.
I even wrote about this in my last article about breathing. More oxygen does not equate to better oxygen metabolism. Our body won’t metabolize oxygen effectively without carbon dioxide; this is known as the Bohr effect.3 The Bohr effect explains how increased carbon dioxide and decreased pH levels in the blood enhance oxygen release from hemoglobin to tissues, facilitating oxygen delivery where it’s most needed.
But during COVID, the WHO recommended oxygen therapies for all patients who had COVID. Now, lung damage could be confounded.
The WHO also commissioned many studies into the use of oxygen; however, the findings were inconclusive. The studies indicated that oxygen did not save lives. But you know what is still used to this day for respiratory illnesses in hospitals? Oxygen.
So even if they had tried to back up their presumption that a person who dies after testing positive for COVID died of COVID, the evidence is still not sound.
But what about the evidence that there was no “novel dangerous virus”? This is not a “no virus” article, by the way. I am not saying there is anything wrong with people talking about that; I am just saying this article is a “no dangerous novel virus” article.
We now have that evidence. We have the Midazolam study.4 The Sy study asserts a statistical correlation (over 90%) between Midazolam injections and excess deaths in England, particularly in care homes, during April 2020…
It suggests these deaths were not primarily due to COVID but to Midazolam, implying possible systemic misuse.
We also have the work of Denis Rancourt, which supports the Sy study. The Sy study needs backing to demonstrate that mortality rates varied based on geographic location. This aligns precisely with the title of Denis Rancourt's study: "2020-06-02 ::: All-cause mortality during COVID-19 - No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response."5
wrote the following in his essay There was No Pandemic:It showed that hot spots of sudden surges in all cause mortality occurred only in specific locations in the Northern-hemisphere Western World, which were synchronous with the March 11, 2020 declaration of a pandemic.
I attributed the excess deaths to aggressive measures and hospital treatment protocols known to have been applied suddenly at that time in those localities.
And we also have the Scottish Inquiry, which is well documented at
’s Substack. The also provides documentation about the Scottish Inquiry.
The Scottish Inquiry has gathered testimonies from the surviving families of alleged COVID victims, as well as healthcare workers and administrators, who admit to the overuse of Midazolam. The testimonies also address the overuse and fraudulent utilization of Do Not Resuscitate forms.
There’s more that could be mentioned regarding the opioid epidemic in the US, where deaths from overdoses during this time rose dramatically. Young people were dying in greater numbers due to drug overdoses, yet 'experts' who focus the debate on lab leaks versus natural origins pretend that deaths in these groups are solely due to the 'dangerous novel virus' or the 'dangerous novel transfection.'
But because nobody is talking about it…
I mean, because anyone who is talking about it is hidden by algorithms that cover up what people are discussing, making it look like nobody is talking about it.
And because fact-checks claims this is untrue, the issue remains controversial.
However, it should not be. People were neglected and given deadly drugs, including midazolam, morphine, and others. This should be regularly acknowledged. There was no “novel dangerous virus.” Instead, dangerous government interventions, spurred by private investors and corporations, caused harm. Massive censorship occurred then and continues to this day.
source of the sensationalist disease mongering video: https://x.com/FrankLuntz/status/1272257493884760064
UK pupils use orange juice to fake ‘positive’ Covid test results https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/02/uk-pupils-orange-juice-fake-positive-covid-test-results
Physiology, Oxygen Transport And Carbon Dioxide Dissociation Curve https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539815/
Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic https://www.medclinrese.org/open-access/excess-deaths-in-the-united-kingdom-midazolam-and-euthanasia-in-the-covid19-pandemic.pdf
2020-06-02 ::: All-cause mortality during COVID-19 - No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=9&name=2020_06_02_all_cause_mortality_during_covid_19_no_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response
Renee, this was the biggest scam -scam is too mild.....this was the biggest violation of our human rights with malicious intent. When governments become the enemy of the people it is time to resist. Do you think the people in the communist countries comply with government directives? No they don't and neither will we.
Leslie
''if you're conditioned to fear something, it can trigger physical responses like rapid breathing, and later, when you try to sleep, your mind might be plagued with fears. This stress can weaken your immune system, possibly leading to illnesses you wouldn't have otherwise experienced.''
It's welll known chronic fear is literally the no.1 worst thing for the human immune system.
https://www.ajmc.com/view/the-effects-of-chronic-fear-on-a-persons-health
....and then there is of course prolonged isolation harm, again this was all well known pre 'COVID.'
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/loneliness-and-social-isolation-leave-mark-blood-2025a10000cf?ecd=mkm_ret_250213_mscpmrk-GB_Perso_etid7227075&uac=407830PV&impID=7227075