No Virus Fixation

by a virus doubter

I really like a lot of “no virus” people. It’s a fringe position to take. I’m not a “no virus” person; I’m more of a “maybe virus” person or a “virus doubter.”
I understand that “no virus” people feel passionately that:

• No virus has ever been proven to exist.

• Electron microscope pictures of viruses are not proof of the existence of viruses.

• Contagion has never been proven in any study.

Sorry, I don’t know if I stated all that correctly. Maybe someone will correct me in the comments section and call me a B, a C, or a Karen…

This is what I’ve been told by the “no virus” people. They say that if I don’t agree and spend the time necessary to see that this is the “truth”—and that it’s “science”—then I’m part of the problem. In fact, I’ve been accused of possibly working for the WhO. One extremely popular person on Substack, with “hundreds of paid subscribers,” recommended that others block me for not taking a strong enough position on this. It wasn’t just that I didn’t take a strong position; I committed “wrong speak” according to him.

I didn’t adequately call out COVID as completely fake, in this article Urgent Need for Closer Examination. The article was about an interview between

Maajid Nawaz

and Wilson Sy, author of Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic.¹ The article is about how in 2020, people were murdered to create an illusion of a dangerous novel virus. Unfortunately I don’t have an “no virus” editor on staff with only a couple of ones of paid subscribers, so now I obviously should be shoved off and thrown away, according to this man.

the man who called for others to block me is doing pretty good

This is how I am doing. It’s fine I am still going to have free content and free comments. If more chose to pay me I would use the money for video editing software. I don’t need it, there is free software I can use!

There are many Substacks and podcasts on the subject of “no virus,” and I’ve been encouraged to spend time reviewing them. But instead, I’ve been busy doing other things—probably a lot of things that are a waste of time, like scrolling through notes on Substack, watching silly YouTube videos, or even writing articles here that won’t be seen or read by my followers or subscribers, because that’s not why they followed or subscribed. I’ve also been busy with things that aren’t a waste of time, like exercising, making home-cooked meals, and trying to take good care of my health, as anyone who believes in terrain theory would do.

During the COVID lockdowns, I came across a video by Dr. Tom Cowan, one of the renowned “no virus” heroes. No idea how it showed up—maybe on Facebook. I settled down to watch it but couldn’t get through it. It sounded like nonsense to me, for one, and it was also extremely boring.

Image links to an article discussing the trend of using Methylene Blue in Medical Freedom circles

I dismissed the whole “no virus” idea until I encountered the fervent believers on Substack. Substack is a haven for “no virus” advocates, and that’s great—they’ve found a place. I know they’re all individuals with their own reasons for questioning virology. They’re all unique, and I respect them. But I don’t respect all of it. I don’t respect the coercion or the speech policing exhibited by some of them.

There is observable behavior by some people in this group that isn’t welcoming but rather demeaning and domineering. I don’t know if these are real people or just fakes thrown into the group to discredit it.

Tereza Coraggio

recently wrote an article on this topic. Her article is called The No-Virus PsyOp. I think she’s quite brave for doing so—just check out the comments. She made some people very agitated. When I see people get that irritated, I don’t start to see things from their point of view. I don’t feel swayed. I’m not more interested in reading thousands of research papers to go fully “no virus.” I totally agree that virology is not what we’re told it is.

People are offended that she called it a PSYOP, but I think, whether or not it’s a PSYOP, it’s evident that it has had a psychological effect on people. They feel so passionately that others need to adopt their views and watch the videos or read the books they link to. As previously mentioned, this isn’t going to win me over. I can see how it wins some people over, but I don’t appreciate domineering people who push me to speak or think a certain way. That’s how I survived the COVID nonsense and said no to a lot of it.

I didn’t need to watch Dr. Tom Cowan to conclude for myself that COVID was fake and that, in 2020, people were murdered to create the illusion of a deadly novel virus.

Even this MD who blocked me on X, couldn’t convince me to take the saline back in 2021

I’ll leave you with this short clip by Jay Couey from

Gigaohm Biological

. I know a lot of people on Substack don’t like him. I do. I don’t agree with everything he says, but I like a lot of what he says.

Gigaohm Biological Peertube channel linked here

What was COVID? Peer pressure to pick a side. Pressuring me to dislike Jay Couey, because others don’t like him won’t work, just like the pressure to take saline shots in 2021 didn’t. I said no to the saline in March 2020 and haven’t stopped questioning since. Jay Couey gets that. In this clip, he theorizes that “No Virus” and “Gain of Function” camps are pawns in a chess game of genomic control, herded into a staged fight to distract. Check it out. Think for yourself. And….Thanks for reading!

1. Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic

https://www.medclinrese.org/open-access/excess-deaths-in-the-united-kingdom-midazolam-and-euthanasia-in-the-covid19-pandemic.pdf