It came to me quite clearly yesterday that everything is being thrown into chaos. That is the purpose, for out of chaos they will bring in the order, the New World Order. Another thing that I recently saw more clearly was that everyone is supposed to be paralyzed, looking for a leader. It doesn't matter what leader or what they say as long as there is no independent grassroots fight back. A thought provoking article, Renee.
The world is in chaos because US based interests in fossil fuels, animal ag, pharma, agrochem, arms, tech and media are being threatened by the rise of BRICS, particularly China, and they don't like it.
I am no virus because I'm a scientist but I don't follow any of the no virus leaders because a) they talk a lot of bollocks particularly about consuming animal products b) they're profiteering and c) because they've all blocked me for pointing out errors in their logic
"They" are the people funding the international think tank groups writing the policies for the UN. "They" also control the banking and investment companies, such as Black Rock..
As I said; health freedom has been manipulated into believing in a NWO psyop by the UN, using policies like ending poverty and global inequality, to destroy us. The actual people, that does include BlackRock, banking and Raytheon, but also, importantly, big animal ag (pharma’s biggest client) and big fossil fuels have succeeded in getting us to support them and post nonsense climate crisis denials but can also smear us (with justification) if necessary as conspiracy fruit loops.
Exellent article Renee, refreshing as usual. The whole 'no virus' thing doesn't lead anywhere useful in terms of reaching your 'unawake' neighbours and politicians vs 'COVID.' It's default tin foil hat category which is exactly where the perpetrators would want you to be. Another two psy-oppy potentials for me is 1- the CONSTANT 4 YEAR+ focus by popular freedom groups and associates to herd the curious public towards covid jab outrage https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newpandemic-limited-focus-of-debate?utm_source=publication-search and 2- the COVID inquiry ''whitewash'' narrative. BOTH approaches distract people away from evidence showing what was really going on Spring 2020 and of course the Scottish evidence must never be spoken of, analysed etc only briefly mentioned if at all. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newinquiry-whitewash-or-something
Thanks 🙏 I think the jab focus is clearly not helping. I wish others would see the problem that we do. I want to call it saline as why wouldn't this trick be played on us? The people who think they own others are murderers, they will play any angle that suits them. It's so easy for people to be fooled into believing it is safe and effective if they mostly use(d) saline. Also, if it is mostly saline being used, it's so easy to maintain the polarization of the 2 groups: pro vac and anti vax.
Scottish inquiry is a unifying force for both sceptic and belivers of the pandemic narrative because so much of it is completely shocking and unarguable and so accountability would be the ONLY moral way forward. Instead people seek more evidence, another theory, something maybe to even entertain them. All the while reality does not change for the better.
To me, the no-virus advocates are similar to Flat-Earth theorists. I respect them for questioning the narratives, find their takes intriguing while implausible, and immediately tune them out once they get 'absolutist'.
Believe what you want, and share with an active mind and civil spirit, sure... but if one is so insecure in their thoughts they demand others think as they? Nope, that's where I exit the proverbial train 🤷🏻
"... immediately tune them out once they get 'absolutist'."
What is the correct way to interpret the data?
100 years of failed contagion studies. No amount of French kissing or snot smeared onto volunteers has ever managed to demonstrate contagion by such intimacy, or sharing of bodily fluids. They even set up holiday camps for volunteers to come and live in and be subjected to various 'pathogens'. Housewives would use them as a free holiday. They had absolutely no fear of getting sick because nobody ever did.
Control experiments. The particles which are often labelled 'viruses' can be produced from sterile cell cultures whether a snot sample is added to it or not. This makes virology unfalsifiable. Virology cell culture experiments (which is how they 'isolate' viruses) is like a camera which takes pictures of aliens on the moon, even when pointed away from the moon. Even when the lens cap is on. They've even assembled the virus genomes from these sterile cell cultures, proving any old genetic material fed into the special virology computer software can be turned into a special viral genome.
It's hard to imagine how this can be interpreted in any other way than "it's all complete bollocks, invented to make vast profits and control people".
The people who claim these particles are anything more than boring old cellular debris... the people who imbue these particles with special magical powers which have never been demonstrated in a lab, or in the real world of snot, kissing and hugging... these are the 'absolutists'. They cling to their superstition, offer ZERO science to back up their beliefs and assertions, and then project their fanaticism onto those who call them out for believing in absurdities by calling THEM fanatics.
If you claim unicorns exist 10,000 times in a row some poor sod is probably going to tell you to stop talking nonsense 10,000 times in a row. The trick of virus pushers, is to take a screenshot of each of their replies and use that as evidence of THEIR fanaticism and 'absolutism'.
17,000,000 people were killed (and many more injured) sine 2021 because of the claim that 'viruses' exist - a claim for which there is no scientific evidence. The onus is on virus pushers to justify their belief in 'viruses'. They should be bending over backwards to prove such particles exist, or publicly rejecting the theory - if only to distance themselves from the mass extermination which has been done in the name of virology.
The 'no virus' people have not made any claims. All they have done is point to the science which falsifies the hypothesis of 'viruses' / 'viral disease' / 'viral contagion'. The scientific evidence is consistent and substantial and covers the last 100+ years.
I am team no virus. However, I don't call out yes/maybe virus covid skeptics I call out both yes and no virus covid skeptics for;
a) personally profiteering from their new prominence
b) falling for the targeting that 'covid' is part of psyop by 'globalists' to depopulate us and
c) falling for the climate crisis being a hoax as part of this psyop which lets big oil and big animal ag (which includes small 'independent' animal farms) (and is pharma's biggest client) off the hook.
The 'health freedom' movement either makes money or has been manipulated into support for the money and thus has been made completely impotent that the division over no/yes/maybe virus is irrelevant.
We're either tools of industry or mad conspiracy theorists. No one is listening to us.
It came to me quite clearly yesterday that everything is being thrown into chaos. That is the purpose, for out of chaos they will bring in the order, the New World Order. Another thing that I recently saw more clearly was that everyone is supposed to be paralyzed, looking for a leader. It doesn't matter what leader or what they say as long as there is no independent grassroots fight back. A thought provoking article, Renee.
Thanks 😊 🙏
Who are 'they'.
The world is in chaos because US based interests in fossil fuels, animal ag, pharma, agrochem, arms, tech and media are being threatened by the rise of BRICS, particularly China, and they don't like it.
I am no virus because I'm a scientist but I don't follow any of the no virus leaders because a) they talk a lot of bollocks particularly about consuming animal products b) they're profiteering and c) because they've all blocked me for pointing out errors in their logic
"They" are the people funding the international think tank groups writing the policies for the UN. "They" also control the banking and investment companies, such as Black Rock..
As I said; health freedom has been manipulated into believing in a NWO psyop by the UN, using policies like ending poverty and global inequality, to destroy us. The actual people, that does include BlackRock, banking and Raytheon, but also, importantly, big animal ag (pharma’s biggest client) and big fossil fuels have succeeded in getting us to support them and post nonsense climate crisis denials but can also smear us (with justification) if necessary as conspiracy fruit loops.
Usually, I wouldn't respond. I've read way too many UN documents, Welsh Gov and UK Gov posts to even give a moment's credence to some "psyop".
Exellent article Renee, refreshing as usual. The whole 'no virus' thing doesn't lead anywhere useful in terms of reaching your 'unawake' neighbours and politicians vs 'COVID.' It's default tin foil hat category which is exactly where the perpetrators would want you to be. Another two psy-oppy potentials for me is 1- the CONSTANT 4 YEAR+ focus by popular freedom groups and associates to herd the curious public towards covid jab outrage https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newpandemic-limited-focus-of-debate?utm_source=publication-search and 2- the COVID inquiry ''whitewash'' narrative. BOTH approaches distract people away from evidence showing what was really going on Spring 2020 and of course the Scottish evidence must never be spoken of, analysed etc only briefly mentioned if at all. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newinquiry-whitewash-or-something
Thanks 🙏 I think the jab focus is clearly not helping. I wish others would see the problem that we do. I want to call it saline as why wouldn't this trick be played on us? The people who think they own others are murderers, they will play any angle that suits them. It's so easy for people to be fooled into believing it is safe and effective if they mostly use(d) saline. Also, if it is mostly saline being used, it's so easy to maintain the polarization of the 2 groups: pro vac and anti vax.
Scottish inquiry is a unifying force for both sceptic and belivers of the pandemic narrative because so much of it is completely shocking and unarguable and so accountability would be the ONLY moral way forward. Instead people seek more evidence, another theory, something maybe to even entertain them. All the while reality does not change for the better.
The perpetrators don't want no virus and classify it as tin foil hat, as it takes away all vaccines.
They don't want the covid inquiry either so they bury it.
That's not a reason to stop banging on about either no virus or 2020 deaths.
To me, the no-virus advocates are similar to Flat-Earth theorists. I respect them for questioning the narratives, find their takes intriguing while implausible, and immediately tune them out once they get 'absolutist'.
Believe what you want, and share with an active mind and civil spirit, sure... but if one is so insecure in their thoughts they demand others think as they? Nope, that's where I exit the proverbial train 🤷🏻
Great piece! 🫡
Thanks Stone! So true about sharing and insecurities.
"... immediately tune them out once they get 'absolutist'."
What is the correct way to interpret the data?
100 years of failed contagion studies. No amount of French kissing or snot smeared onto volunteers has ever managed to demonstrate contagion by such intimacy, or sharing of bodily fluids. They even set up holiday camps for volunteers to come and live in and be subjected to various 'pathogens'. Housewives would use them as a free holiday. They had absolutely no fear of getting sick because nobody ever did.
Control experiments. The particles which are often labelled 'viruses' can be produced from sterile cell cultures whether a snot sample is added to it or not. This makes virology unfalsifiable. Virology cell culture experiments (which is how they 'isolate' viruses) is like a camera which takes pictures of aliens on the moon, even when pointed away from the moon. Even when the lens cap is on. They've even assembled the virus genomes from these sterile cell cultures, proving any old genetic material fed into the special virology computer software can be turned into a special viral genome.
It's hard to imagine how this can be interpreted in any other way than "it's all complete bollocks, invented to make vast profits and control people".
The people who claim these particles are anything more than boring old cellular debris... the people who imbue these particles with special magical powers which have never been demonstrated in a lab, or in the real world of snot, kissing and hugging... these are the 'absolutists'. They cling to their superstition, offer ZERO science to back up their beliefs and assertions, and then project their fanaticism onto those who call them out for believing in absurdities by calling THEM fanatics.
If you claim unicorns exist 10,000 times in a row some poor sod is probably going to tell you to stop talking nonsense 10,000 times in a row. The trick of virus pushers, is to take a screenshot of each of their replies and use that as evidence of THEIR fanaticism and 'absolutism'.
17,000,000 people were killed (and many more injured) sine 2021 because of the claim that 'viruses' exist - a claim for which there is no scientific evidence. The onus is on virus pushers to justify their belief in 'viruses'. They should be bending over backwards to prove such particles exist, or publicly rejecting the theory - if only to distance themselves from the mass extermination which has been done in the name of virology.
The 'no virus' people have not made any claims. All they have done is point to the science which falsifies the hypothesis of 'viruses' / 'viral disease' / 'viral contagion'. The scientific evidence is consistent and substantial and covers the last 100+ years.
My take is implausible? In what way? https://jowaller.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
I am not insecure. And the Earth is of course a globe shape.
hello virus doubter.
I am team no virus. However, I don't call out yes/maybe virus covid skeptics I call out both yes and no virus covid skeptics for;
a) personally profiteering from their new prominence
b) falling for the targeting that 'covid' is part of psyop by 'globalists' to depopulate us and
c) falling for the climate crisis being a hoax as part of this psyop which lets big oil and big animal ag (which includes small 'independent' animal farms) (and is pharma's biggest client) off the hook.
The 'health freedom' movement either makes money or has been manipulated into support for the money and thus has been made completely impotent that the division over no/yes/maybe virus is irrelevant.
We're either tools of industry or mad conspiracy theorists. No one is listening to us.
FYI, I eat meat .