My Thoughts On The Film Terrain
A “no virus” person told me to watch this, because this is what convinced them that there is no such thing as contagion
I love you, the “no virus” people! My concern is that we get off topic when we demand that people prove the existence of viruses. It’s, like, way too simplistic! Personally I think the effect of it is, that you are preaching to the choir.
I agree this message resonates with a lot of people, I get that. But a lot of other people hear it, and are turned off by it.
Instead I think we would get more, out of focusing on the other harms of which, there are many : pHARMa (overmedicalization), industrial chemicals, lifestyle, censorship, mandates, authoritarianism, fraud, forcing people to take tests that they don’t want, etc
But, somehow, people think the best way to get out of this is tyranny, is to stick to this “no virus” thing, which oftentimes comes off as very dismissive in my experience.
The film starts off with a bunch of fluff about fear
This is about fear: So if I don’t join the “no virus” people, then, I am now afraid?! Is it unacceptable to think that there may be viruses but that I don’t need to be afraid!?
Can Terrain theory and contagion exist at the same time?! I personally don’t see why this is so crazy. Terrain theory says that we need to take care of our terrain. Here’s how we do that: we need to not be afraid, we need to eat properly, exercise, get enough rest, have a social life, have quality time alone spent doing hobbies, go outside, have physical contact with people, get a cat, get a dog, get a fish, learn breathwork ..etc... I agree with all of that.
The Rosenau paper
In this part of the film they talk about how this paper explains that there is no such thing as contagion. In this experiment, they took a “contagion” and exposed healthy people to it. What they proved here: terrain theory. Healthy people are not susceptible to contagion. You can believe this and still think that viruses might be real. You can have two ideas at the same time. There’s no reason why you cannot.
The thing is, very few people in North America, are actually healthy, so you have basically said, who cares about these people? Reminds me of something ….. Depopulation anyone?
Bacteria
In the film Sally Fallon says : “One of the many roles of bacteria is to clean up dead tissue.”
But that’s not what “no virus” people say to me, they say that the only role of bacteria is to clean up dead tissue.
I may follow up on this. I don’t want to be too much of an A-hole on this subject.
I will maybe……. or not… I will maybe follow up because I only just got past the fluffy part in this film in this post here, subscribe for more…
https://www.knowingthetruth.com/terrain-the-film-full-documentary/
The pursuit of the truth is vital. The pursuit of justice may be possible with any number of ideas about how illness spreads. It's important to keep an eye on the goals.
Yes, understanding the truth about illness is important. It's also important to have a way to reduce the attacks on people today, and if that requires political actions, having the acceptance of many people could be important. So it matters in that context how we pursue the truth. Alienating people who would otherwise help may be part of the point.
In the last few years the "flat earth" group seems to have inspired the "no virus" group to be more vocal. Good. There is also now a "nuclear weapons don't exist" group which is actually offensive to people who have lost relatives to the bomb tests. Scepticism is fine, but some people are rude.
Sorry to post yet another time, I was reading your post on “being a tyrant” - and I would just say that if the danish government had acted even a scintilla of that draconic as eg us or Canada (not to mention China, Australia or other places), I would also have been very much antipathetic towards those whom we elected to look out and take care of us citizens.