Regarding the "alternative media"... most of the well-known names in it are limited hangouts. The "main stream" of "alternative media" is now just an extension of the "mainstream" or "legacy" media, offering a secondary explanation for events that's just as false as the official one. Some even take that for granted now, and it doesn't seem to have bitten them in the ass yet.
There's always going to be a lot of turnover in alt media as limited hangouts are exposed and lose their audience while others are being introduced. And there's always a percentage of alt media that's going to be bought off by the system, selling out for views and revenue.
I always say a good rule of thumb is "beware good production values", but that's not to be applied too strictly without discernment. I'm pretty good with graphics and writing and all that, and I like to think my stuff's pretty polished. I think the riskiest indicator is when someone's getting paid to be a truther. It's hard for me to say that because I know how desperate most of us are for money now. But we have to stay alert and skeptical. The BEST way to vet people's work is to know what games the oligarchy is playing already and compare the assertions of the person in question to that knowledge.
Thanks for sharing my toolkit, and I'm glad to see someone getting something out of it!
The original article contains of lots of good but perhaps stale information but the organizational skills and clarity of the exposition is lacking. It's stuck somewhere in between stream of consciousness speaking and first draft unpolished writing assignment.
Secondly, it's absurd to juxtapose this stuff next to Couey who himself is pretty guilty of engaging in many many of the points. You'd have to be blind to not see it, or were like me, in early with far too much good faith reserves.
"Moved on" as in dropped spell and left the cult of Couey?
He hasn't said a prescient thing about biology in years and spends most of his time grifting on the current media cycle's outrage points. He can't and won't take scientific criticism of his thrown together talking points, at least publicly. Instead he launches into character assassination using stale info like in this list which seems like insight to naive necomers to the control of the Internet.
He's somewhere between captured opposition, always-been controlled opposition or barely functional academically brainwashed nutjob. I've given up figuring out which, and discarded the notion that "his perfect biology" is relevant in a world where people reject facts and reasoning in favor of their Internet illusions and favorite ecelebs schtick.
And something stinks about his connections to Erasmus, UPenn, DRASTIC and RFMKULTRAjr info ops. Him and AJL seem to be low quality influence wranglers at the far end of dissent.
Sad but true.
Hope you're well
Won't find me on stream ever since he called me a glowie of kneejerk childishness.
Well, I went into them a tiny bit on stream and he told me to "get out". I posted about them extensively on his empty social media platform, which he doesn't interact with unless you make him angry and then he just acts badly.
I challenged the O2 therapy being iatrogenic like he wildly claimed, based on my knowledge and EMS experience for example.
I challenged IM injections "of any form" talking point as there are many IM interventions in EMS that work and work well.
For the most part I agreed, supported or feel I helped cultivate a lot of the good stuff over a couple of years only to be treated like shit by a guy who must be controlled opposition if only for the way he treats people, and I mean people like soothspider, pameladrew on and off and most recently pmcdunnough on stream. I stopped watching but somebody pointed me to it.
I see his actions/lack of as not only undermining his own credibility, basically everyone's figured out he's a hot potato, but also undermining dissenting views especially those that still think "the biology matters".
The State was lying, and no manner of complete facts and solid reasoning gets to people, especially delivered this way. It's why I fall into the position of him being an op himself, a low quality one as the runway of the pandemic and virus narratives have run out.
"I do understand that this is going to be extremely difficult to understand for many who are wired up or engrained to seek a hero and who have high trust levels.
The campaign to win hearts and minds (Pacification and Control) simply must provide you with Spirit Leaders and Thought Leaders who will derive your trust by saying things that you like to hear knowing that when they shift their rhetoric you will like them so much that you will choose to be loyal more than discerning.
Much like the sheep in Animal Farm learning a new song from Squealer the Rockepig."
That sums up why I left his sockpuppet site recently when he attacked pmcd. It's too obvious who's left cheering him on.
How about out and out threats, of loss of their licence to practice, to medical doctors who try to speak out about what they were seeing in their practice. And what about the enormous sums of tax payer's dollars to the mainstream media? This was warfare on the truth!
LOVE your title! As usual...as I don't always read each article in full (LOW attention span🤦♀️), I do recognize the amazing research in time and presentation, R. 🙏👏👍
Regarding the "alternative media"... most of the well-known names in it are limited hangouts. The "main stream" of "alternative media" is now just an extension of the "mainstream" or "legacy" media, offering a secondary explanation for events that's just as false as the official one. Some even take that for granted now, and it doesn't seem to have bitten them in the ass yet.
There's always going to be a lot of turnover in alt media as limited hangouts are exposed and lose their audience while others are being introduced. And there's always a percentage of alt media that's going to be bought off by the system, selling out for views and revenue.
I always say a good rule of thumb is "beware good production values", but that's not to be applied too strictly without discernment. I'm pretty good with graphics and writing and all that, and I like to think my stuff's pretty polished. I think the riskiest indicator is when someone's getting paid to be a truther. It's hard for me to say that because I know how desperate most of us are for money now. But we have to stay alert and skeptical. The BEST way to vet people's work is to know what games the oligarchy is playing already and compare the assertions of the person in question to that knowledge.
Thanks for sharing my toolkit, and I'm glad to see someone getting something out of it!
The original article contains of lots of good but perhaps stale information but the organizational skills and clarity of the exposition is lacking. It's stuck somewhere in between stream of consciousness speaking and first draft unpolished writing assignment.
Secondly, it's absurd to juxtapose this stuff next to Couey who himself is pretty guilty of engaging in many many of the points. You'd have to be blind to not see it, or were like me, in early with far too much good faith reserves.
So you've moved on? He has some great graphics, and I agree 100% with his take about Social Media.
What's the question?
"Moved on" as in dropped spell and left the cult of Couey?
He hasn't said a prescient thing about biology in years and spends most of his time grifting on the current media cycle's outrage points. He can't and won't take scientific criticism of his thrown together talking points, at least publicly. Instead he launches into character assassination using stale info like in this list which seems like insight to naive necomers to the control of the Internet.
He's somewhere between captured opposition, always-been controlled opposition or barely functional academically brainwashed nutjob. I've given up figuring out which, and discarded the notion that "his perfect biology" is relevant in a world where people reject facts and reasoning in favor of their Internet illusions and favorite ecelebs schtick.
And something stinks about his connections to Erasmus, UPenn, DRASTIC and RFMKULTRAjr info ops. Him and AJL seem to be low quality influence wranglers at the far end of dissent.
Sad but true.
Hope you're well
Won't find me on stream ever since he called me a glowie of kneejerk childishness.
Who's AJL? I'm not following anyone very closely. I'm not very cultish.
Angry Jay Leno, his handler.
Everything seems to have gone right down hill after he showed up.
I also find that Mark adds value. You might find that my posts mention him too. Just a warning.
What was your scientific criticism/s?
Well, I went into them a tiny bit on stream and he told me to "get out". I posted about them extensively on his empty social media platform, which he doesn't interact with unless you make him angry and then he just acts badly.
I challenged the O2 therapy being iatrogenic like he wildly claimed, based on my knowledge and EMS experience for example.
I challenged IM injections "of any form" talking point as there are many IM interventions in EMS that work and work well.
For the most part I agreed, supported or feel I helped cultivate a lot of the good stuff over a couple of years only to be treated like shit by a guy who must be controlled opposition if only for the way he treats people, and I mean people like soothspider, pameladrew on and off and most recently pmcdunnough on stream. I stopped watching but somebody pointed me to it.
I see his actions/lack of as not only undermining his own credibility, basically everyone's figured out he's a hot potato, but also undermining dissenting views especially those that still think "the biology matters".
The State was lying, and no manner of complete facts and solid reasoning gets to people, especially delivered this way. It's why I fall into the position of him being an op himself, a low quality one as the runway of the pandemic and virus narratives have run out.
At least some of us skeptics survived it all.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-nassty-cabal
"I do understand that this is going to be extremely difficult to understand for many who are wired up or engrained to seek a hero and who have high trust levels.
The campaign to win hearts and minds (Pacification and Control) simply must provide you with Spirit Leaders and Thought Leaders who will derive your trust by saying things that you like to hear knowing that when they shift their rhetoric you will like them so much that you will choose to be loyal more than discerning.
Much like the sheep in Animal Farm learning a new song from Squealer the Rockepig."
That sums up why I left his sockpuppet site recently when he attacked pmcd. It's too obvious who's left cheering him on.
Fair enough. I still find what he is saying is valuable sometimes. Maybe you will not enjoy my posts. Just a warning for you.
How about out and out threats, of loss of their licence to practice, to medical doctors who try to speak out about what they were seeing in their practice. And what about the enormous sums of tax payer's dollars to the mainstream media? This was warfare on the truth!
Leslie
not only that, what about all the people who say they're on our side, but they are actually shills, or influenced by shills!
Them as well!
LOVE your title! As usual...as I don't always read each article in full (LOW attention span🤦♀️), I do recognize the amazing research in time and presentation, R. 🙏👏👍