Bot Pharms & Controlled Opposition

and their role in fake pandemics

Apr 10, 2026

Many social media accounts are likely working for—or being paid by—pharmaceutical companies. And if not by pharma companies, then by other corporations that profit from situations which, in turn, benefit the pharma industry.

0:00

-3:59

The biggest example, of course, is the fake pandemic of 2020.

There is currently no broad legal requirement forcing pharmaceutical companies (or others who benefit from pharma agendas) to disclose that an account is funded, sponsored, or covertly managed by a drug company. This makes it very difficult to distinguish between independent voices and those that are paid.

If you read a previous post of mine, you’ll also know how social media operates in ways that slide or hide important conversations.

Technique #1 – Forum Sliding

If a very sensitive, critical post is published on a forum, it can be quickly removed from public view through forum sliding.

In this technique:

A number of unrelated posts are quietly pre-positioned on the forum and allowed to “age.”
Each of these misdirectional posts can then be called upon at will to trigger a forum slide.

A second requirement is the existence of several fake accounts, which ensure this technique isn’t exposed to the public.

To trigger a forum slide and flush the critical post out of view:

Log into each account (both real and fake).
Reply to the pre-positioned posts with a brief one- or two-line comment.

This pushes unrelated posts to the top of the forum list, causing the critical post to slide down the front page and quickly out of sight. Although outright censorship may be difficult, the post becomes buried in a sea of unrelated, useless content.

This method effectively keeps readers focused on non-issues rather than real discussions.1

Controlled Opposition

Question: Why do some social media accounts get more visibility than others, even when they are contrarian—that is, they oppose the pharma model?

Answer: Controlled opposition.

Not only are there fake accounts used to control online discussions, but there are also bot farms. (Watch this short video)

These bot farms use cell phones because mobile devices effectively disguise bot activity.

What can bots do?

Like posts
Share content
Comment on posts

A study released in March 2025 found that:

“both datasets were dominated by pro-vaccine accounts; most highly active (59%) and highly visible (50%) accounts classified as probable bots were pro-vaccine.”2

While some “anti-vax” bots may appear genuine, they may actually be funded by pharma to divert audiences from valid criticism—another form of forum sliding.

Watch the short video below for another example of how we were misled about our perceptions of social media.3

Example: The Measles Post That Got Ignored

For instance, this recent X post by Sanjeev Sabhlok (@sabhlok) got very little attention, despite alleged anti-vax bots. Only 2 likes and 578 views. Where’s the love? Isn’t this a strong argument against the current measles scam?

“This is a fantastic chart:
—the book contains other useful information, too.
A GOOD CHUNK OF THE UK POPULATION REMAINED UNDERNOURISHED EVEN IN 1940.
E.g. milk. With poorer sections of the UK unable to afford sufficient milk, the only way measles mortality could have been eradicated is with higher incomes AND lower prices of milk. Both of these happened by 1960, as a result of which measles mortality almost entirely disappeared—MANY YEARS BEFORE THE MEASLES VACCINE.
DESPITE THIS, idiot ‘doctors’ keep claiming that the measles vaccine is crucial to the control of measles mortality.
No! The data are 100% clear. If you (hypothetically) stop the measles vaccine today among rich parents who can afford sufficient Vitamin A (milk, butter, cod liver oil, carrots, etc.), there will be close to zero deaths from measles. THIS IS CONCLUSIVE. NOT SPECULATION.”4

Sanjeev Sabhlok@sabhlok

This is a fantastic chart: fao.org/fileadmin/temp… - the book contains other useful information, as well. A GOOD CHUNK OF THE UK POPULATION REMAINED UNDERNOURISHED EVEN IN 1940. E.g. milk. With poorer sections of the UK unable to afford sufficient milk, the only way measles