I am writing this post as a layman on the topic of “infectious clones” and virology mythology.
Since COVID, or after COVID (AC) we are repeatedly told that we must “trust the science” and listen to the “experts”. I realize that this began earlier than COVID. But AC, this ideology has been ever more aggressively pushed on us.
Inspired by Jonathan Couey’s live-stream, I suggest that we start to read up on “the science” or watch the videos that they release on YouTube and ask questions. I suggest that we do not comply. This is how to do that:
do not trust the experts, become your own expert!
Vincent Rancienello and David Baltimore invented the “infectious clone”. They took an RNA virus and made an RNA copy. The copy was the first “infectious clone”.
JJ Couey is ignored by the “experts” and so this indicates to me that he is not an “expert” so I will bring him into my analysis of “infectious clones”. 1
JJ Couey is arguing that “infectious clones” are the illusion of virology. They want you to believe that there are signals like this in the wild. They claim they can grab them and grow them and study them. But in reality they haven’t been able to do this, until recently with the “infectious clones”.
“Infectious clones” are what is used in gain of function research. But how dangerous is the research? Is it possible that this research is not the danger that we are led to believe it is? It is apparent to me that the most dangerous thing there is right now is fear. It is interesting that the “experts” on either side of the COVID origin debate put forward a message of fear.
As I am now an expert, because I do not comply with the order to “trust the experts”, I suggest the danger is exaggerated, hugely exaggerated.
It is very clearly exaggerated!
Early on in COVID Dr. Jay Battacharya claimed that COVID was especially dangerous to the elderly.2
Now that some of the censorship has calmed down, we have access to information about why COVID was particularly dangerous for the elderly. Specifically, I suggest that you watch the Scottish Inquiry3, where it becomes apparent that many people who are claimed to have died of COVID in spring of 2020, actually died as a result of “end of life” protocols which were used in hospitals and Long Term Care homes in Scotland. It is clear that these “end of life” protocols were used all over the world4; there is a lot of testimony to prove that these “end of life” protocols were used all over the world, but I will not be discussing this in this article.
Will they be able to develop harmful gain of function viruses in the future? As an expert, I would confidently say no. How does it make sense that something so minuscule - so tiny that you can only see it using an electron microscope - could be as dangerous as they assert? Do we truly understand if these signals are harmful at all?
This is probably why I was banned from Facebook for 30 days in July of 2020. Clearly, I was already an expert at that time when I posted that research shows that the Coronavirus is very delicate and cannot survive sunlight. It’s not rocket science. If something is that small, it must be extremely fragile. How could it be as powerful as these experts™️ assert?!?!?! The answer is that it cannot.
I don’t buy it. I don’t think the solution to any disease is poverty, it just doesn’t make any sense at all.
People will say, but what about EBOLA or AIDS or ZIKA? My answer to that is we don’t really have all the details, other than there is one detail that is pretty clear to me. Especially in the case of EBOLA and ZIKA, these viruses thrive in countries where poverty and corruption are widespread, even more so than in the Western world.
Here is my evidence:
Quote “Ebola disease is caused by a group of viruses, known as orthoebolaviruses (formally ebolavirus). Orthoebolaviruses were discovered in 1976 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and are found primarily in sub-Saharan Africa.” end quote5
Quote “DRC is among the five poorest nations in the world. An estimated 74.6% of Congolese people lived on less than $2.15 a day in 2023. About one out of six people living in extreme poverty in SSA lives in DRC.”6end quote
Quote “In a country where most people depend directly on land, laws and policies governing its use and management support big investors rather than ordinary Ugandans. They exclude the poorest from enjoying their land rights while benefiting corporations and already wealthy individuals.”end quote7
Quote “Zika virus is an emerging mosquito-borne virus that was first identified in Uganda in 1947.”end quote8
Note that all of the measures in response to COVID have led to significantly higher levels of poverty in the Western world9.
This is the real danger of virology. It is being used to take from the poor and give to the rich.
The topic of AIDS has been covered by many writers and skeptics, and today I will not be examining that. I will only say that it seems clear that AIDS also appears to be part of the method used in the implementation of authoritarianism, with the recommendation that to counter viruses, we must submit to governance by corrupt globalist individuals.
This is tyranny. It is taking something so tiny - that questioning it’s existence is entirely valid - and turning it into a method of impoverishing the globe and installing a never-ending tyranny in the form of a bio-surveillance totalitarian world government.
Therefore, I hope you will consider my advice and, rather than trusting the experts, become your own expert by evaluating their claims and posing critical questions.
Thank you for reading!
Well said Renee! You nailed it!
Leslie
Thus by now, Zika virus has been emerging for 77 years and still hasn't properly emerged.
Let that sink in.