It's an irrefutable fact the 'dissident' covid vaccine narrative has taken precedent over the last 5 years as the main narrative to be concerned about. I've never believed that was the biggest story in town and for 'sticking to my guns' on what i thought WAS has left what i post about completely unsupported by ALL popular covid critics 'speaking out.' In 2025 ignored and even blocked. (Blocked=Rancourt, Hockett, Engler, Ignored=Yeadon).
Thanks 🙏. I agree, it's a trap. It's hard for people to see, but it's undeniable that much of what algorithms push to the top are the most polarizing subjects. This is why anti-vax content gets so much attention. What actually happened in the spring of 2020 is far more important. Now, with the Scottish inquiry, we have gold-standard evidence of what occurred. If this were elevated, those who profited—and continue to profit—from pandemic narratives would lose their positions of power and fame.
It's an irrefutable fact the 'dissident' covid vaccine narrative has taken precedent over the last 5 years as the main narrative to be concerned about. I've never believed that was the biggest story in town and for 'sticking to my guns' on what i thought WAS has left what i post about completely unsupported by ALL popular covid critics 'speaking out.' In 2025 ignored and even blocked. (Blocked=Rancourt, Hockett, Engler, Ignored=Yeadon).
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newpandemic-limited-focus-of-debate?utm_source=publication-search
Thanks 🙏. I agree, it's a trap. It's hard for people to see, but it's undeniable that much of what algorithms push to the top are the most polarizing subjects. This is why anti-vax content gets so much attention. What actually happened in the spring of 2020 is far more important. Now, with the Scottish inquiry, we have gold-standard evidence of what occurred. If this were elevated, those who profited—and continue to profit—from pandemic narratives would lose their positions of power and fame.