Twitter Is Not Free Speech

Co-infections occur all the time

I rarely spend time on Twitter anymore. I rarely reply to tweets by doctors, scientists, politicians on Twitter anymore. I thought that maybe if I stopped replying to tweets then my account would become more visible. I thought maybe the problem I was having was replying to others was considered “hate”. I don’t think that is the problem. The problem is I do not embrace the narrative™. If you do not recite the narrative™ then you are “awful” and are not to have freedom of reach.

Recently in August of 2024 I replied to David J Speicher PhD DTM who retweeted a post by Dr. Clare Craig. Surprisingly David replied to me. And we had a brief exchange. But not to worry, hardly any humans observed it because like I mentioned earlier I am “awful”.

David reposted this tweet that Dr. Clare Craig had posted:

It seems not a single lesson has been learned over the last four years. If you call a weak positive test result a "case" then healthy people breathing contaminated air get called "asymptomatic cases". It's all nonsense. "Infection" is meaningless in the absence of symptoms.

In his re-posting of her tweet he said this:

Absolutely

@ClareCraigPath

!!! PCR is a powerful and sensitive tool but should only be used on SYMPTOMATIC people. If you are asymptomatic you are healthy. We don't need another casedemic!!!

I came in with a reply to David which was:

I don't know why you need to test. If you have a cold get rest and cut the sugar. If you have shingles or blisters same. In some cases maybe antibiotics will be needed. Most people who die or have severe outcomes have co-morbidities related to poor metabolic health.

And he actually replied to me, this rarely happens. Here is his reply:

Antibiotics don't work for viral infections and it's important in some cases to know what pathogen is causing the disease.

I replied to him with this:

people can have a viral infection and a bacterial infection at the same time. All the testing products have this written on their insert. It's likely that this information about viral infections resulted in many deaths. Testing is actually harmful if this is true.

and then Dr. Clare Craig agreed with me in her reply here:

I agree. Pandemic planning for a virus included the need to stockpile antibiotics to prevent secondary pneumonias. Also, certain antibiotics have antiviral and anti inflammatory properties too. They are normally given for any community pneumonia without testing. With covid antibiotic prescription plummeted. Testing can lead to doctors treating the test result not the patient.

And David was allowed to say this because someone more important than him had put him in his place:

Co-infections occur all the time which is why a secondary bacterial infection during flu or COVID is a problem. So it's good to know what you're dealing with so you can treat it correctly.

To which I replied:

sounds good, I bet you there are a lot of doctors and governments that don't care about what is good. They just test only for COVID, and then. OH they died. COVID again.¹

And after I said that, we were back at square one:

How many people died because they were not given antibiotics? After they died it was not a lack of treatment that was the cause, it was a positive COVID test.

If co-infections are common, then how come nobody seems to know about this? And how come many doctors are still not enlightened about this? Because it is not the narrative™.

“Co-infections occur all the time.” Co-infections occurred in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and they continue to occur now in 2024.

This is why the most dangerous thing that you can do is get tested for a novel virus, because the end result will be that you will be denied lifesaving treatment and given novel dangerous protocols instead. Later on you will be dead and recorded as a death related to the novel virus.

You will just be another statistic.

1. copy and paste so that Twitter does not know how you found this:

https://x.com/xRenee0/status/1826367339585233302