The Rise of Canadian Hate
Funded by the Canadian Government under Justin Trudeau.
In Canada, COVID “vaccines” became available to the public, on December 9th 2020. Look at the footnotes before commenting.
The “vaccines” were approved under Interim Order. Under an Interim Order the “vaccine” was made available faster than it would have been if it had been approved in the traditional manner known as Notice of Compliance or (NOC). With an IO the product is given to people while it is still in clinical testing, this is called a “rolling review”. 1
On Health Canada’s website the following is stated on “vaccines” that may be approved:
Although 50% efficacy is the target threshold, vaccines that don't reach this threshold may still be considered for authorization.
FOIPOPs reveal that after vaccination of 85% of the population of Nova Scotia, the number of deaths attributed to COVID was 11.4 times more than in 2021.
There was a spike in deaths in Nova Scotia in January of 2022. It must have been a coincidence that at the same time there was a ramped up booster campaign with 302,242 booster shots administered in Nova Scotia.
From Stats Canada:
excess mortality peaked in January 2022 with 21.6% more deaths than were expected in that month. This was the highest rate of excess mortality in Canada since the start of the pandemic.2
On April 25th 2022 a study was published in the CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal). The research for this study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) is Canada's federal funding agency for health research.
The title of this study was Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission.3
Regina Watteel, BSc. Hons Math & Physics, MSc. PhD. Statistics, has called out this study.
She has written the book Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science.
In addition she has outlined the fraud in a letter to U of T. This letter was sent to U of T, the employer of the authors of the study. Here are some outtakes from that letter 4:
The study is based on a model. Well-established methodology calls for such validation of models by using real world outcomes.
The authors simulated an epidemic that had already occurred this past winter, got it wrong, then proceeded to overwrite history by stating that they “found that the choices made by people who forgo vaccination contribute disproportionately to risk” when, in actuality, incident rates were found to be disproportionately higher amongst vaccinated individuals.
To date, the authors have failed to clarify that their “findings” do not relate to real events and are, in fact, opposite reality. This despite many researchers, scientists and others calling on the authors to do so. Instead, the authors have staunchly stood behind their contrived results to the detriment of society. Concerns provided to CMAJ from fellow researchers have been met with hand-waving dismissive responses, deflections and further falsehoods.
To fully understand the fraud of this paper you can purchase her book, by clicking on the link below.
I just want to point out that STATS Canada has changed the wording on their website. Just a coincidence probably. It now reads this: "After the emergence of Omicron as the principal variant of COVID-19, excess mortality peaked in January 2022 with 21.6% more deaths than were expected in that month. This was the highest rate of excess mortality in Canada since the start of the pandemic. In the following months, the number of deaths fell generally within the range of what might be expected had there been no pandemic."
"To date, the authors have failed to clarify that their “findings” do not relate to real events and are, in fact, opposite reality."
Now, where DID I put my 'shocked face?' 🤦🏻
Excellent piece, Renee 💯