Staged Event : COVID 19
This content is controversial and is suppressed by thought police
This is part 6 of a summary I have been writing about a video that was removed from YouTube on November 30th of 2023. The video is an interview hosted by Mark Kulacz of Housatonic Live. In the video he interviewed
, who has been investigating what went down in New York city in the spring of 2020. If you wanted to check out the previous articles, I have linked the last one right here, the rest are linked in that article:
According to the data which Jessica has received as a result of Freedom of Information applications, the hospitals were not over-run in spring of 2020. But, strangely deaths in hospitals were reported to be high.
In the chart below you will see that less people were visiting the hospitals, but more people were dying in the hospital.
So how does this make sense?
Jessica explains that one of the possible reasons was that during this time, in New York and in other places there were directives to EMS (emergency medical services) regarding how to handle cardiac arrest calls, to reduce spread. So when the ambulance showed up to pick up the patient, because of these directives they would not have been transported to the hospital. Instead they may have died prior to getting into the ambulance, or while in the ambulance. The order was to leave the dead body with the police. I have linked this advisory to the article. Would this death then be considered a COVID death? I expect so.
Audio version:
She says the time series data, shows a very disturbing trend in this time. Around the same time as these directives, dispatched ambulances, and the number of patients pronounced dead at the scene are both high. The transport data also shows a huge drop in patients being delivered from the point of pick up to the hospital. In addition the reports show higher amounts of home deaths.
Some of the ambulance orders suggested that people should be sedated in the ambulances, or there might be a need for heavy sedation. During this time, when young people showed up at the hospital, unable to breathe, were these people sedated while in the ambulance? Maybe, the doctors and nurses aren’t lying. While in the ambulance “safe and effective” treatments could have been used. The effect could have been that it was more convincing for hospital workers that there was a “novel, dangerous virus.”
Fifteen days to stop the spread was announced on March 16th, and 911 call data spiked, for life threatening situations. Jessica says that she used to think that it might have been just people panicking, and that no ambulances were actually dispatched to these calls, but now she realizes there was a call redirection, which she explains in the video.
Because the hospitals were not in fact over-run, there’s a perception that people were staying away from the hospital. But it appears that they were just dying after the ambulance came to their home. It looks like people were calling for help but the help was not helping.
Jessica says she saw the same thing happening in data she got from other locations, and there were similar directives in these places.
In addition to all of this there was a statement by CMS, the federal agency, saying that, when these orders/directives were in place, that ambulance companies would still be reimbursed. I have been looking into this further and came across this PUBLIC LAW 117–2—MAR. 11, 2021, AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021. It appears that they would have been reimbursed, just not for the mileage to transport the patient to the hospital.
Mark asks if it is possible that drug over-doses may not have been treated in the way that they normally would have been during this time. Normally opioid drug overdoses are treated with NARCAN. In their conversation they spoke about how a freedom of information application would be a way to discover if this is something that had happened. So in this case the patient would have died in the ambulance, because there was possibly a directive to not treat with Narcan, and they never would have made it to the hospital, would these over-dose deaths have been considered COVID deaths in the books? Again I am going to remain non committal in my answer to the question. Maybe….
Mark also brings up that an overdose is a Cardiac event. So if the directives were to dissuade helping a patient to prevent spread, it could easily have taken the form of denying the patient NARCAN.
In particular this situation with Emergency Services could explain the extremely high amounts of deaths claimed to have happened during this time. In this case, these deaths could have easily been counted twice. And it would also be easy to claim that it was by mistake. Each death, which happened after an ambulance had been dispatched to the scene, could have been counted as a death in the home and as a death in the hospital, because it was a death in limbo, ultimately. This would have greatly inflated the numbers.
Jessica expects that one day the truth will be revealed, and it is likely that they will admit that they made an error. The error was of overcounting the deaths, which is fraud. By committing this fraud, the illusion of a novel dangerous virus could become something that people would panic about. And it would be fair to expect that this error will only come to light when those who made the error are not likely to face any consequences. Unless people start to become more active, in asking these questions, it will be swept under the rug. It is not a small error.
To be continued.
Many good workers were stripped of severance, and management failed in many ways all the way to the top
One can only assume that something very malicious was going on. The data was skewed to fit the narrative. Science was silenced and consequently we are obligated to disbelieve what "they" say.
Leslie