Set a New Course

misleading dichotomy

Isn't the laboratory incident merely a diversion from more pressing matters? That is my contention. It serves as a tactic to direct our attention towards a specific particle and figure like Fauci. If we truly wish to prevent such occurrences in the future, we must delve into the intricate details regarding how the particle was not the primary cause of the fatalities, or what compelled individuals to undergo the toxic transfections.

image links to the study

The rationale behind my conviction that this approach is imperative stems from the fact that when I broach this topic with individuals online, they often exhibit a lack of familiarity with Midazolam. Instead, their awareness revolves around the lab leak theory and Fauci. Yet, this has failed to sway their opinions, attributing to me labels like a "flat earther." For years, the emphasis of this movement has been on the lab leak theory, but what progress has it yielded?

Photo by Sonja Langford on Unsplash

Conversely, when I elucidate the significance of Midazolam, it offers a more tangible elucidation of the events that transpired. Lives were extinguished to fabricate the illusion of a deadly particle. This parallels the scenario with opioid-related fatalities, where the blame is unjustly placed on the particle….

… Such conclusions are devoid of a scientific basis. Those who profess to "trust" in science must be guided towards empirical data and indisputable facts.

If you believe this absolves Fauci of any responsibility, you are mistaken. He is accountable for spreading unwarranted fear and fueling hypochondria. However, he is not solely culpable. What if those behind this scheme also strategized an exit plan? What if their way out entailed relying on their adversaries to hinge on inconclusive evidence rather than indisputable and incriminating proof?

They aim to persuade you that it was due to a particle. I reiterate this because I believe it lies at the heart of this matter. The establishment consistently emphasizes that “correlation does not imply causation”. Yet, they have failed to delve into the fundamental issue of the particle predicament. Just because I test positive for a virus does not inherently signify that it is the cause of my illness or demise, as “correlation does not imply causation”.