I still can't get my head around how an outspoken medic from GLASGOW has chosen not to speak about the Scottish COVID-19 inquiry on his podcast in 2 years (yes i did get an invite in 2024 which i politely declined and soon after was BLOCKED on X) nor write any articles about it not like or restack ANYTHING form my account and yet still put's himself out there as a fearless truther asking for people's money. The honest Doc also called me a troll and a bully, sticks and stones. He has more time and energy to call me names than the following which a committment toward may not be good for business? 'Freedom/Truth Incorporated.'
I recall that there was efforts to find him a guest willing to speak on his show. And a guest was suggested, and apparently there was no follow up on that.
The outsourcing of views for a public inquiry never sits well with me. Yes, i suggested Adam Stachura from AGE Scotland who spoke on GB News. Contact details for Adam were sent through an intermediate account. I never got an update as to what happened. Despite my presentation of the evidence NO ONE 'speaking out' wants to speak about ANY of this. I got a whole 12 restacks for this amongst the millions of covid critics out there. We are winning! lol
I'm very suspicious when anyone tells me not to resist. (and I don't care what it is, I will probably resist) About the criticism, something like that in public is highly contentious.
Bit of pot calling kettle black here - Doc M is saying that person’s “presentation” wasn’t good enough but I stopped being a paid subscriber to Doc because I thought his presentation style wasn’t good enough. He also rambles, goes on long-winded monologues where he repeats himself and repeats stuff he’s said in other podcasts, doesn’t let his guests speak as much as they should, gets weirdly uptight / worked up as he’s doing this in a way that comes across as unprofessional and unbalanced rather than “passionate”…plus his emails are just a wall of text of self-promotion with only two sentences sometimes dedicated to describing the actual podcast and having to scroll past the long as self-promo of his consultation service and affiliate links to get to the bloody hyperlink for the show.
I get that he gave up his doctor job to do this stuff but I also think he could chill out on the self-promo a bit - if his work and podcasts are AH-MAZING then people will seek out that info (like consultation service) for themselves on his stack or website - a short line and link is enough. I also think if he wants to get agitated and monologue this much, he should do it on a separate show each week where it’s just him monologuing as it comes across as pretty rude for guests (he excuses this by saying he’s trying to have a “two way chat” not an “interview” but still lands a bit prententious).
Also yeah as you say “Honest Health” is a sure fire way to put people off. It’s like a car salesman branding himself as “Honest Car Salesman” LOL…plus he’s not so honest about somethings like “Covid” etc so a bit of a misnomer really
The reason this is happening is because it’s controlled by online algorithms, with programming to demote and deflate actual resistance. It's working very well. The people who rise are connected and comply with directions from the establishment. This is why we can’t make any progress!
I still can't get my head around how an outspoken medic from GLASGOW has chosen not to speak about the Scottish COVID-19 inquiry on his podcast in 2 years (yes i did get an invite in 2024 which i politely declined and soon after was BLOCKED on X) nor write any articles about it not like or restack ANYTHING form my account and yet still put's himself out there as a fearless truther asking for people's money. The honest Doc also called me a troll and a bully, sticks and stones. He has more time and energy to call me names than the following which a committment toward may not be good for business? 'Freedom/Truth Incorporated.'
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
I recall that there was efforts to find him a guest willing to speak on his show. And a guest was suggested, and apparently there was no follow up on that.
The outsourcing of views for a public inquiry never sits well with me. Yes, i suggested Adam Stachura from AGE Scotland who spoke on GB News. Contact details for Adam were sent through an intermediate account. I never got an update as to what happened. Despite my presentation of the evidence NO ONE 'speaking out' wants to speak about ANY of this. I got a whole 12 restacks for this amongst the millions of covid critics out there. We are winning! lol
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquiry17-jun-273?utm_source=publication-search
I'm very suspicious when anyone tells me not to resist. (and I don't care what it is, I will probably resist) About the criticism, something like that in public is highly contentious.
Leslie
Do you think I should not bring up this criticism because it is contentious?
That is entirely up to you....
Nothing seems contentious anymore. If people don't like what you're saying, they just block. There's no dialogue anymore.
Bit of pot calling kettle black here - Doc M is saying that person’s “presentation” wasn’t good enough but I stopped being a paid subscriber to Doc because I thought his presentation style wasn’t good enough. He also rambles, goes on long-winded monologues where he repeats himself and repeats stuff he’s said in other podcasts, doesn’t let his guests speak as much as they should, gets weirdly uptight / worked up as he’s doing this in a way that comes across as unprofessional and unbalanced rather than “passionate”…plus his emails are just a wall of text of self-promotion with only two sentences sometimes dedicated to describing the actual podcast and having to scroll past the long as self-promo of his consultation service and affiliate links to get to the bloody hyperlink for the show.
I get that he gave up his doctor job to do this stuff but I also think he could chill out on the self-promo a bit - if his work and podcasts are AH-MAZING then people will seek out that info (like consultation service) for themselves on his stack or website - a short line and link is enough. I also think if he wants to get agitated and monologue this much, he should do it on a separate show each week where it’s just him monologuing as it comes across as pretty rude for guests (he excuses this by saying he’s trying to have a “two way chat” not an “interview” but still lands a bit prententious).
Also yeah as you say “Honest Health” is a sure fire way to put people off. It’s like a car salesman branding himself as “Honest Car Salesman” LOL…plus he’s not so honest about somethings like “Covid” etc so a bit of a misnomer really
Always amazing, isn't it? How the wrong people get the "right" attention? To promote their own rabbit-hole excitation fueled by fans of such...🤷♀️
The reason this is happening is because it’s controlled by online algorithms, with programming to demote and deflate actual resistance. It's working very well. The people who rise are connected and comply with directions from the establishment. This is why we can’t make any progress!
and really that is such a shame because much can be learned from an exchange of opinions.