It's Not About Who Is Censored, It's About What Is Censored!
Intriguing Censorship
Jay Bhattacharya has faced censorship, similar to many others, and the situation persists for some individuals. This censorship may partly function as a psychological operation (psyop). Censoring certain figures often elevates their status in specific circles. While numerous individuals have been censored since then, their plight frequently goes unnoticed.
Remember when censorship seemed intriguing, as it marked the truth-tellers? Over time, the perception has shifted; many are now censored without anyone paying attention. Those previously censored have gained significant roles in government, like Jay who is now the director of the NIH, yet the ongoing censorship of others elicits little concern.
Do let me know if you have heard that Jay is concerned about current censorship; I am not aware of that.
A more insightful approach to understanding censorship might focus on the topics that are silenced rather than solely on the individuals being censored. By doing so, we can avoid inadvertently elevating certain voices that may not address relevant issues, while recognizing that others may be silenced for discussing subjects that are deemed taboo, such as the Scottish inquiry.
Recently, when trying to upload a video on X using my premium account, I faced repeated errors. Of course, it was just a “glitch.” So, I tested uploading the same video to my YouTube channel, where I encountered no issues.
Consider the possibility that X may impose obstacles for those who post content not aligning with a certain narrative. This could be why my attempt to upload the video was unsuccessful. Will anyone take notice? Probably not, as it seems unfashionable to pay attention to those censored in 2024 or 2025. That narrative feels outdated, reminiscent of 2020 and 2021.
Here is a link for the article Dave wrote about being kicked off X in 2024:
Here is the video, credit to
When you have censorship you know whatever you do hear is BS. Unless it is out right slander, no one should be interfering with information. Leave to us to decide what to believe.
Leslie
That's a home run Renee- ''A more insightful approach to understanding censorship might focus on the topics that are silenced rather than solely on the individuals being censored.''
I've repeatedly said EVEN IF people don't like me (even though you can't really know anyone in the digital world) that should NEVER take away from the INFORMATION i post ABOUT. eg- Shocking official evidence from public inquiries. So when i hear popular 'outspoken COVID critics' mention things like they won't 'help me' with Scottish inquiry because i am not a team player or whatever it's just another way they've sussed how it can be avoided. Tragic.
Also what needs to be cleared up is that no-one is 'helping me' by circulating Scottish evidence, they are helping themselves and humanity. I gain no fame nor fortune and have zero interest in either for my efforts.
In 2025 i'm actually amazed so many popular freedom groups, alt media and COVID critics who often charge their followers for 'truths' get such a free pass ignoring all these real facts i've been posting about freely for 15 months, exposing what really happened in 2020. Pretty wild!
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-peoples-covid-inquiry