Important Details Are Pushed Aside
The Busy "Whistleblower"
The pharmaceutical industry publishes misleading articles in medical journals. These articles are "peer-reviewed"—but what does that really mean? Does it mean that the drug or potion promoted in the article will actually work for you, or is it simply another gimmicky way to get you to consume a product?
Disease mongering is a marketing strategy. Pharmaceutical corporations create fearful narratives that are repeated by people employed in "health" care, but many or most of these narratives are false and designed to persuade you that there is only one solution. Conveniently, it is the solution they recommend: health advice that ultimately leads you to take a pharmaceutical product.
By the way, this includes people who suggest that you need Ivermectin, a pharmaceutical product, for every possible reason under the sun. I know a man who consumed 8 tubes of the paste, and the problem didn’t go away. Then he took a bunch of tubes of fenbendazole; again, this didn’t work. Why did he do that? Because he is convinced that the resistance presented to him through algorithms is the true resistance.
Unfortunately, much of the resistance to the pharmaceutical industry and other deceiving forces is fake, as I will explain further on in this article. Those in the fake resistance have convinced him that he needs a pharmaceutical product. One that is purported to work on COVID because it has antibiotic properties. However, antibiotics cause a great deal of harm to the microbiome, which is a real thing. So why would anyone think that Ivermectin would be safer than other antibiotics that people generally try to avoid? I guess it is hard to think straight when you are under attack. Many of us are feeling that way these days.
I do think that many of these people employed in "health care" are convinced that there really is only one way. I can understand why, because once again the resistance to pharma and other deceiving forces is mostly coming from compromised, fake people. The mainstream resistance is fake.
One thing that should make it obvious that many in the resistance are fake—but somehow does not—is that many of those who are most elevated in the resistance were formerly employed in the pharmaceutical industry. Somehow, they truly believed there was no wrongdoing until 2020 when pharma made its biggest attack on your body and mind than ever before. All of a sudden, these people are "whistleblowers"; anyone asking questions about this is called divisive and many times accused of working for pharma themselves.
Perhaps it is possible that some of these "whistleblowers" have good intentions; however, there are many red flags that I see, one of which is that some of these "whistleblowers" are currently not being censored or hidden by algorithms at all. Another red flag is that most of their "whistleblowing" is quite vague and avoids getting into details. One of the things that I am seeing them avoid is the Substack written by Dave at
. He is not charging any money and he publishes very detailed work that comes from the Scottish Inquiry. As mentioned, what would be more helpful from a "whistleblower" is details, not vague statements.The details coming from the Scottish Inquiry are damning. It does not shock me because this was exactly what I had suspected at the time: that people were being harmed and that these harms were being blamed on a pathogen and not on the people who participated in harming others. These are the details that we were missing in 2020. Now that these details are coming to light, mostly because of Dave’s work—and a few others like
—we have to ask why the "whistleblowers" who were formerly employed by Pharma are not trying harder to boost this information. Even if they are busy with other tasks, which they claim are important, isn’t it vitally important that others become aware of important details that could prevent future disastrous events from happening?