How long has science in the medical field been unreliable? The exact duration remains uncertain to me. Online platforms often promote creators using algorithms that favor the current system, which is heavily influenced by pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical corporations allocate a significant portion of their resources to advertising and “public relations” rather than genuine research. The effectiveness of their products seems to be less important than creating a persuasive narrative that convinces people of their necessity.
In 2021, Journeyman Pictures released a video featuring an interview with Leemon McHenry, PhD, who is a co-author of the book "The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine: Exposing the Crisis of Credibility in Clinical Research". However, the video may not have received the attention it deserved, as it could potentially instill doubt in the minds of the public. Within this corrupted system, any hesitation towards untested medications is condemned, similar to a form of coercion reminiscent of Stalinism.
In the interview Leemon explains that the pharmaceutical industry has increasingly resorted to questionable practices such as medical ghostwriting, where clinical trial outcomes are promoted through deceptive articles often attributed to influential figures who have not contributed at all to the content. This trend should erode trust in medical journals, revealing them as platforms that serve corporate interests rather than upholding scientific integrity. Such tactics, coupled with disease mongering, exploit fear to drive the unnecessary consumption of medications, signaling a disturbing shift in the priorities of medical marketing. This behavior can lead patients to take drugs with unfavorable risk-benefit profiles, raising ethical concerns regarding the integrity of pharmaceutical research
This practice of ghost writing should erode all trust in medical journals; however, online platforms are meticulously curated by machines - AKA Pooters - that suppress, divert, or corroborate any narrative diverging from this evident one, or anything even remotely aligned with this actuality.
It is crucial to be discerning about the sources we rely on, as they may unknowingly or knowingly be supported by pharmaceutical interests. Platforms and creators that perpetuate disease mongering receive more visibility and financial backing. Therefore, it is essential to deliberately and mindfully reduce your exposure to sources that fail to emphasize key points:
such as the findings of the Scottish Inquiry indicating that there was no pandemic there was only murder
and the deliberate diversion caused by the lab leak versus natural origin debates surrounding CAWVID.
In times like these, repetitive messaging is crucial as many individuals have become resistant to logical reasoning, influenced by disease mongering narratives on various topics. The dissemination of vital information may face obstacles due to online algorithms that prioritize sensationalism over reason. There is a need to find innovative ways to convey essential messages that draw people's attention, despite the system's inclination to amplify voices that deviate from rational discourse.
Well-established advocates for medical autonomy persist in concentrating on inconclusive evidence and refrain from disclosing irrefutable proof. It's important to share vital information to help others understand the reality of this situation. However, online categorizations limit the reach and visibility of this information, making it hard to spread. Dividing people into acceptable and unacceptable groups makes it difficult to share important information widely, requiring more personal interactions to combat the widespread manipulation. As has been pointed out by
:People really need to be asking some serious questions of their ‘alt’ media and ‘freedom’ gurus as to why they continue to focus on ‘COVID vaccines’ at the expense of the more damning official and CONFIRMED evidence as to what really happened in care homes in 2020 which fully exposes the roots of ‘the pandemic’.
I wrote that I liked the term "Disease mongering"...reminds me of "fear porn"...control by fear tactics.
And the Scottish Inquiry got it right, hey? Not covid pandemic, murder . Scream.
Love your avatar!!!